Donnerstag, 5. Dezember 2013

iOrnament-App - science-to-touch

iOrnamentIPad

Science-to-touch is a collection of projects which are aimed at interactive visualization of science. The basic philosophy behind the project is that visualization and interactivity makes science accessible, understandable and fun. Science-to-touch tries to provide high quality content that helps to get in touch with various interesting topics. All projects should be equally creative, informative and accessible.
A particular aim of the science-to-touch project is to create software for touch devices. This software should provide a natural way to interact with the images and imaginations behind scientific concepts.

The first project available in this context is the iOrnament app of Jürgen Richter-Gebert, mathematics professor at the Technical University of Munich. It's a drawing and explanation tool for the 17 crystallographic wallpaper groups. This app provides a highly creative drawing environment for symmetric patterns, as well as lots of interactive background explanations on this topic.

The iOrnament App grew out of a sequence of related programs that were developed over the past 25 years. The oldest ancestor of iOrnament is a program "Ornament" that was written by the author of these pages and presented at the symmetry exhibition in Darmstadt 1986. The program allowed to draw black and white wallpaper pictures at that time on an Atari computer. Inspired by this similar programs were written that ran in various Mathematics exhibitions among them the exhibition ix-quadrat at TU Munich and the German Museum in Munich. The amazing fact about these kind of programs is that everyone starting from a three year old child to an highly intellectual adult can at the same time be creative, have fun with them and learn something about mathematical structures.

http://www.science-to-touch.com/en/iOrnament.html

Engraved Ornament project V&A London

V-A

The V&A has one of the most important collections of engraved ornament in the world. With funding from the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation, the museum has embarked on a project to catalogue all 24,000 prints, thereby making them available to visitors and scholars online. The collection spans four centuries with designs for everything from jewellery to tomb-stones. Through this blog we will be revealing some of the highlights.

Visit the Blog of Sarah Grant, Curator of Engraved Ornament at the V&A.


http://www.vam.ac.uk/b/blog/engraved-ornament-project

Montag, 30. September 2013

Questioning the frame in the decorative systems of the modern era Paris, May 9 - 10, 2014

International symposium organized by the CHAR (HICSA, University
Paris 1 Panthéon - Sorbonne), the Centre François-Georges Pariset
(Université Michel de Montaigne - Bordeaux 3) and the GEMCA (Catholic
University of Louvain)

In its ability to create systems, modern decor emerges as a phenomenon
of artistic practice that deserves further analysis. Between the
fifteenth and eighteenth centuries, decoration reached a particularly
high degree of elaboration and complexity through the multiplication
of presentation devices in the visual discourse, while simultaneously
integrating the spatial constraints imposed by supports. This
symposium seeks to explore the originality of this phenomenon through
the question of the frame. Often neglected and marginalized in studies
pertaining to decoration, the frame constitutes one of its essential
dimensions, which conditions not only modes of perception but also
provides paths towards understanding the mechanisms of decorative
systems. Indeed, if decorative systems are the place par excellence of
experimentation with the boundaries between real and representational
spaces, subtle and varied framing games are the active agents, and
shall be explored during this event.

Quadri riportati, architectural elements, anthropomorphic and hybrid
figures, feigned materials (tapestries, parchment, leather, etc.),
medallions, cartouches, and festoons are some examples of framing
devices which, far from being accessory or gratuitous, carry a
multitude of illusionistic, syntactic, and semantic implications,
all-the-while participating in the visual splendor and the
mise-en-scène of the representation. Through the definition and
articulation of these particular spaces and discursive registers,
framing devices create interpretative solutions, conditioning and
guiding the perception and comprehension of visual discourse. Even
when the frame appears as a disjunctive element, which separates and
differentiates, it can still allow for conjunctions and transitions
through space, or, through an excess of reflexivity and a tendency for
autonomy, blur and provoke a crisis in the hierarchy between the
visual regions. By taking into consideration this perpetual shifting
of frontiers, these games and perspectival challenges, the goal of
this symposium is to question the framing devices of decorative
systems in the modern era. In other words the objective is to
understand how the frame participates in the transformation of decor
into a system that produces meaning across a variety of supports and
mediums.

Among the many issues raised by this topic, some possible themes
include:

- What are the specific mechanisms in decorative practice used for
defining and creating spaces, images, and graphic or symbolic
representations? Could this use of the frame contribute to the
definition of certain tendencies or aesthetic currents?

- In terms of reception, what are the devices used to create frontiers
or passages between the decor and the viewer? In what ways does decor
create effects of presence and distance, thus contributing to the
viewer’s experience?

- How does the ornament of the frame respond to the principle of
decorum? To what extent does this constitute a transgression? How does
the relationship between ergon and parergon apply in this context? How
do the boundaries and transitions between these different areas
challenge the traditional hierarchies of representation and create
spaces of freedom and autonomy?

- How can the transition between different mediums and contexts
provoke, for similar devices, varied readings corresponding to
particular challenges? How does the use of different materials, real
or feigned, participate in the framing process, from an aesthetic as
well as a symbolic point of view?

Developing on studies which, since the 1960s, have been problematizing
the issues of the frame in the visual arts, and adhering to the
current revival of interest in question of the ornamental, this
symposium aims to shed light on this essential issue in the art of
the modern era, which is the decor.

Abstracts of no more than 300 words (in French or English) should be
sent before October 15, 2013 by email to the address:
cadre.decor.2014@gmail.com

Organizing Committee:
Nicolas Cordon, Edouard Degans, Elli Doulkaridou, Caroline Heering

Scientific Committee:
Pascal Bertrand, Nicolas Cordon, Edouard Degans, Ralph Dekoninck,
Elli Doulkaridou, Caroline Heering, Philippe Morel, Victor Stoichita

Download the call for papers in PDF format:
http://f.hypotheses.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/855/files/2013/07/Appel-cardre_decor_ANG.pdf

Donnerstag, 9. Mai 2013

Falten-Muster: Texturen der Bildlichkeit (Basel, 31.05-01.06.2013)

eikones_logo

Konferenz Konzept: Mateusz Kapustka, Martin Kirves, Christian Spies, Martin
Sundberg

Organisation: eikones (Basel), ERC-Projekt TEXTILE (Zürich)

Veranstaltungsort: eikones NFS Bildkritik, Rheinsprung 11, CH-4051 Basel

www.eikones.ch
http://eikones.ch/nc/veranstaltungen/detail.html?tx_cheikonesevent_pi1%5Buid%5D=322&cHash=c3527d164b5d283b2888c5f5f212c525

Die Veranstaltung ist öffentlich.

Falten-Muster: Texturen von Bildlichkeit

Falte und Muster bezeichnen zwei Prinzipien, die – offensichtlich oder
versteckt – innerhalb der Kunst allerorts als formbestimmende Größen
präsent sind. Doch wie lassen sich Falte und Muster genau fassen, wie
verhalten sie sich zueinander und inwiefern erweisen sie sich gar als
konstitutive Momente von Bildlichkeit?
In mehrfacher Hinsicht stellen Falte und Muster gegensätzliche Größen
dar: während Falten Räumlichkeit erzeugen, indem sie eine Fläche durch
ihre Zusammenziehung auf- und einwölben, negiert das Muster eine solche
Räumlichkeit zur Fläche, der ihrerseits durch die Musterung eine eigene
Tiefenräumlichkeit zukommt. Die verschiedenartigen Formen der
Räumlichkeit gehen mit einer unterschiedlichen Strukturiertheit von
Falte und Muster einher: Sind Faltenformationen vor allem asymmetrisch
organisiert, erfordert der für das Muster konstitutive unendliche
Rapport eine symmetrische Anordnung.
Ein materieller Kreuzungspunkt, der es erlaubt, Falte und Muster in
ihrem Spannungsverhältnis zu untersuchen, ist das Textil. Bereits die
durch Kette und Schuss erzeugte Materialstruktur des Stoffes weist eine
Affinität zum Muster auf, während der Stoff aufgrund seiner materiellen
Flexibilität eine zu gestaltende Faltenbildung geradewegs einfordert,
so dass Falte und Muster vermittels des Textils Texturen von
Bildlichkeit hervorbringen. Um die darüberhinausgehende Reichweite von
Falte und Muster für die Erzeugung von Bildlichkeit auszuloten, wird
neben dem materiell fundierten Verständnis des Textils, auch seine in
der Materialität verankerte Metaphorizität thematisiert werden.

Programm

Freitag 31.5.2013

14:00 – 14:30 Begrüßung und Einführung von Christian Spies (Basel)

und Mateusz Kapustka (Zürich): Verknotungen und gefaltete Muster

Moderation: Agnes Hoffmann
14:30 – 15:15 Sabine Mainberger (Bonn): Muster und Falte(r) bei
Vladimir Nabokov
15:15 – 16:00 Martin Sundberg (Basel): Gegenläufige Bewegungen.
Teppich, Falte, Muster in der Moderne
16:00 – 16:30 Kaffeepause

Moderation: Nina Gerlach
16:30 – 17:15 Anne Röhl (Zürich): Falten zwischen Form und Anti-Form
in Robert Morris? felt works
17:15 – 18:00 Dietmar Kohler (Halle): Wie Fotografien Räume bilden
– Wolfgang Tillmans' postmedialer Bildbegriff

Moderation: Martin Sundberg
18:15 – 19:15 Abendvortrag mit anschließender Filmprojektion:
Mieke Bal (Amsterdam): Unfolding Thought Folds
20:00 – 22:00 A Long History of Madness - a film by Mieke Bal &
Michelle Williams Gamaker

Samstag, 1.6.2013

Moderation: Arno Schubbach
9:00 – 9:45 Nina Wiedemeyer (Berlin): Buchfaltenmuster / Textilität
von Mustern des Scharniermediums Buch
9:45 – 10:30 Tristan Weddigen (Zürich): Textile Bildräume
10:30 – 11:00 Kaffeepause

Moderation: Sophie Schweinfurth
11:00 – 11:45 Stefan Trinks (Berlin): Der Knoten im Grab –
Semantisiertes Ornament und entfaltetes Bild
11:45 – 12:30 Helga Lutz (Erfurt): Räume aus Falten, Falten aus
Mustern, Muster aus Bändern (15. Jhdt.)
12:30 – 13:30 Mittagspause

Moderation: Mateusz Kapustka
13:30 – 14:15 Martin Kirves (Basel): Faltenraum und
(Gold-)Mustergrund in der Kunst um 1450
14:15 – 15:00 Antje von Graevenitz (Amsterdam): Hautfalten zum
Verbergen und Enthüllen im niederländischen ‚Kwabornament’ des 17.
Jahrhunderts – eine ornamentale Strategie gegen das Ornament

Sonntag, 5. Mai 2013

...

rsa

New York, March 27 - 29, 2014
Deadline: May 24, 2013

Reexamining the Early Modern Ornament Print (RSA 2014)

The large and varied corpus of works that fall under the rubric of
“ornament prints”, “Ornamentstiche” or “Ornamentale
Vorlageblätter” have been variously catalogued and recorded since the early nineteenth century. These important studies give us a general overview of when
and where the prints were made, the artists who made them and their
probable functions. Many critical questions remain, however, not least
the fundamental problem of what constitutes the genre itself. Rudolf
Berliner’s notion of the ornament print as a template, for example, has
proven to be overly one-dimensional and not representative of historic
practice. Is it possible to define or formulate specific parameters for
the genre as a whole? This session invites papers that take a wide
view on the theme of non-architectural ornament prints from the
fifteenth through seventeenth centuries. Questions and topics to be
considered could include:

• what is an ornament print?

• the origins of the genre

• the imagery of ornament prints

• the relationship of ornament prints to the other arts

• the creators of ornament prints, e.g. the goldsmith-printmaker

• the purpose and utility (or lack thereof) of ornament prints

• early collectors of ornament prints

• copying versus ownership of design

Call for papers: http://www.rsa.org/?page=2014NewYork

Montag, 21. Januar 2013

Do you know this ornament? ;) Let's see...

0_marimekko-unikko

Sabina sent me this picture: Andy Warhol ("Flowers", 1964, Offset Litograph on paper)
Very nice idea, thank you :)

andy-warhol-flowers-1964-FS-II-6

Günter Irmscher

Irmscher1

Günter Irmscher, Studium der Kunstgeschichte, Archäologie und Philosophie an mehreren Universitäten, Promotion in Köln; Mitarbeit an Museen und bei forschungsfördernden Institutionen; Lehraufträge an der Universität Köln. Spezialisierung auf die mitteleuropäische Kunst ca. 1550-1650, darüber hinaus Beschäftigung mit Architekturtheorie und -dekorationssystemen, aber auch mit der Goldschmiedekunst desselben Zeitraums. Zu diesen Themen zahlreiche Bücher, Aufsätze, Katalogbeiträge, Rezensionen sowie eigene Ausstellungen.

Gewählte Publikationen:
- Das Schweifwerk. Untersuchungen zu einem Ornamenttypus der Zeit um 1600 im Bereich ornamentaler Vorlageblätter, Köln 1978.
- Kleine Kunstgeschichte des europäischen Ornaments seit der frühen Neuzeit (1400 - 1900), Darmstadt 1984.
- Das Laub- und Bandlwerk: zur Geschichte eiens vergessenen Ornaments, Begleitheft und Katalog zur Dokumentationsausstellung im Salzburger Barockmuseum 7. Mai - 6. Juli 1991.
- Kölner Architektur- und Säulenbücher um 1600, Bonn 1999.
- Amor und Aeternitas: Das Trionfi-Lavabo Christoph Jamnitzers für Kaiser Rudolf II, Wien Mailand 1999.
- Das Kölner Goldschmiedehandwerk 1550-1800, 2 Bde., Regensburg 2005.
- Ornament in Europa 1450-2000. Eine Einführung, Köln 2005.

Dienstag, 15. Januar 2013

What is the Use of Ornament in Contemporary Art and Architecture?

Writer Glenn Adamson, artist Grayson Perry, architect Sam Jacob from FAT and Charles Jencks, architectural theorist discuss ornament and decoration in both art and architecture at the ICA (Institute of Contemporary Arts, London)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B14uaSxLong

Montag, 14. Januar 2013

Do you know this ornament? ;) Let's see...

Panton_Chair_Junior_all__98682_zoom

Montag, 5. November 2012

Questions of ornaments (15th-18th century)

logo_kikirpa

On 16 and 17 February 2012 IRPA-KIK (Royal Institute for Cultural Heritage, Parc du Cinquantenaire 1, B-1000 Bruxelles) organized its 13th Art History Seminar, Questions of ornaments (15th-18th century): 3. Three-dimensional art.

http://www.kikirpa.be/EN/263/61/activities/77/16-17|02|2012%20%20S%C3%A9minaire%20d

The study of ornament enjoys an obvious renewed interest since around 15 years now. Far to be only considered as a directory of motives likely to enhance a grammar of styles, ornament appears today as a surprisingly complex phenomenon. The vague definition of the ornament concept, almost elusive, is a reflection of his multifaceted nature. Next to its esthetical role, recent studies emphasized the symbolical, anthropological, political and socio-economical functions assumed by ornament. In addition, going through all artistic fields in different ways and degrees, ornament cannot be reduced to a specific artistic category. This transversal character of ornament, linked with this typical dependence to other artistic mediums, has often contributed to classify ornament as useless and marginal additions, even to minority and femininity. Nowadays this characteristic of ornament seems to offer a new exploring field, allowing to revisit our current perception of art’s hierarchy. Thinking early modern ornament requires indeed to understand its connections with the different artistic genres.

The objective of this series of three conferences, launched in December 2009, is to take stock of the actual state of the arts, as well as to open new perspectives for research. More particularly, the point is to engage in a theoretical and methodological reflection, fed by particular case studies, on the questions of epistemological and historiographical nature.

After a reflection on the links between ornament and architecture (Namur, FUNDP, December 2009, http://gemca.fltr.ucl.ac.be/docs/program/20091204_ornement.pdf) and between ornament, painting and graphic arts (Louvain-la-Neuve, UCL, February 2011, http://gemca.fltr.ucl.ac.be/php/evenements/20110204.fr.php), this third conference was dedicated to the three-dimensionality of sculpture in its broad perspectives.

User Status

Du bist nicht angemeldet.

Aktuelle Beiträge

no name
ornament-art - 11. Jan, 21:14
ORNAMENT i DEKORACJA...
Tegoroczna LXIII ogólnopolska sesja Stowarzyszenia...
ornament-art - 10. Nov, 13:14
Print Quarterly, vol....
Contents of Print Quarterly, volume XXXI (2014), number...
ornament-art - 8. Sep, 12:16
Architektur & Ornament...
Tagung/Conference/Conféren ce Mythos Orient. Architektur...
ornament-art - 8. Sep, 12:15
Questioning the frame...
Paris, INHA, May 9 - 10, 2014 Journées d’études internationales...
ornament-art - 8. Mai, 13:46

Links

Suche

 

Status

Online seit 4493 Tagen
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 11. Jan, 21:14

Credits


Artists
Books
Conference
Contact
Exhibitions
Ornamental Prints
People
Project
Questions for you
Profil
Abmelden
Weblog abonnieren
Kostenlose Homepage